<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER  No. 1811 -- 1/23/2008 >>>>>

I sort of hate to have to do two newsletters in the same day about Compete
America's peridy against American workers, but when I went to their website
to do researcj fpr the first newsletter about their fix for H-1B, I
couldn't help but see an annoying graphic that changes between a "blue
card" and a "green card" as you move your mouse over it. They also offer a
pdf file that they claim is an advertisement, so apparently they plan to
unleash their propaganda on the unsuspecting public.

In typical fashion Compete America is being highly misleading because the
"blue card" has far more in common to the H-1B than "green cards". Like the
H-1B visa, the blue card would be a temporary visa that would be used
primarily for high-tech workers, and because the employer owns the visa,
the worker is indentured. Blue card holders are given visas for 2 years and
in similar fashion H-1Bs are for 3 years. Some people argue that the H-1B
is quite different because blue cards offer a path to citizenship, but that
too is a misconception because H-1B is a "dual intent" visa that allows
visa holders to apply for permanent residency.

So, considering the fact that Compete America isn't stupid, why are they
holding onto the myth that blue cards are like green cards? I suspect their
motivation has less to do with facts and more to do with clever marketing.
The cheap labor lobby knows all too well that H-1B comes with some heavy
baggage and negative connotations, whereas green cards are adored by all
the media darlings, pundits, politicians, and even dumb engineering
associations like the IEEE. If I read Compete America's intent correctly,
they would be OK with green cards if we had a whole lot more of them, and
we gave them to anyone that Intel, Microsoft felt deserved them.

To see their animated graphic, go here and put your mouse over the blue
square -- you can download the pdf ad  on the left side of the page:

http://www.competeamerica.org/

<<<<<>>>>>

The blue card received a lot of publicity when Craig Barrett of Intel wrote
an op-ed for the Washington Post where he opined about the necessity of
increasing the number of H-1B visas in order to compete with Europe.

I published a rebuttal to Craig Barrett's op-ed that you can read at either
one of these two links. You can leave comments on the vindy.com page if you
care to give an opinion.

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_548336.html

http://www.vindy.com/news/2008/jan/15/claims-that-us-future-depends-on-immig
rants-puts/

John Miano got a short rebuttal in a letter to the editor in the Washington
Post and that's also worth a read, so it's included below.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.vindy.com/news/2008/jan/15/claims-that-us-future-depends-on-immig
rants-puts/

Claims that U.S. future depends on immigrants puts ‘con’ in Silicon
Valley
By Rob Sanchez

Tuesday, January 15, 2008


By ROB SANCHEZ

SPECIAL TO THE VINDICATOR

Intel Chairman Craig Barrett made dire predictions in a Jan. 2 Vindicator
column that the next Silicon Valley will not be in the United States due to
restrictive immigration policies and that a brain drain from the United
States to Europe will cause an economic Armageddon. In his hypothetical
scenario, the United States would lose out in the competition for talent as
the best inventors and entrepreneurs migrate to Europe.

This scaremongering is a smokescreen to hide Barrett’s desire to increase
the labor supply, thereby slashing labor costs.

High-tech industries such as Intel routinely make false claims that there
are shortages of qualified Americans. Anecdotal claims of shortages are
touted in order to make the corporate case for increasing the number of
H-1B visas. Recent studies, such as one by the Urban Institute, show the
United States is creating fewer high-tech jobs than the number of qualified
people who are entering the workforce.

Dubious claims

Intel’s claim that it can’t find enough talented workers is dubious,
given that Intel is eliminating thousands of jobs in locations such as New
Mexico, California and Oregon. If Intel is having such a tough time finding
qualified workers, why are they firing so many workers already in their
employ?

Barrett asks us to take a leap of faith when he warns that worldwide
shortages of high-tech workers are endemic. He furthers his argument by
saying that Europe will win the competition to attract scarce talent when
the European Union institutes a new visa called the "blue card." Like the
H-1B visa in the United States, the blue card would be a temporary
guest-worker visa that indentures each worker to the employer. Other
similarities between the H-1B visa and the blue card include their
not-so-subtle purpose of undercutting and replacing more expensive domestic
workforces. Both the blue card and H-1B visa offer temporary employment and
after a set number of years a path to citizenship.

If passed, Europe would not be able to use blue cards to drain our human
capital because both continents have worker gluts, not shortages. There is
an even more obvious reason none of this is likely to happen -- Europe
doesn’t have a blue card program yet, and it’s just as likely that it
never will.

European labor groups have been resisting the blue card because they
don’t want a fiasco like the H-1B program foisted upon them. They argue
that blue cards, like H-1Bs, would accelerate the unemployment of their own
domestic high-tech workforce. "We have 3.5 million unemployed and that
means that companies can find workers within Germany," said Olaf Scholz,
Germany’s employment minister. He implored employers to hire their own
people instead of using blue cards to import foreign workers.

Here and there

Socially responsible attitudes prevalent in Europe are sadly absent in the
United States, where public policy is driven by corporate agendas. Scholz
stands in stark contrast to U.S. Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, who
justified the expansion of the H-1B program in a Parade Magazine article by
blaming American workers for having lousy attitudes and saying they need
anger management.

EU policy-makers face many obstacles before the blue card becomes reality.
One of the toughest is negotiating a uniform salary level among members who
have large wage disparities. As currently proposed, visa holders would be
required to earn at least three times the minimum salary of each host
nation. That would work out to be about $4 an hour in Lithuania and $30 in
Ireland.

Intel does not hesitate to use the corporate clich´e that more
employment-based visas are necessary to attract the "best and brightest"
into the United States. If Intel were sincere, its CEO wouldn’t be so
worried about competing with Europe for $4 per hour computer programmers.

>> Rob Sanchez is a senior writing fellow for Californians for Population
Stabilization.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/31/AR2007123101
775.html

Opening the Door to More Skilled Workers?

Tuesday, January 1, 2008; A10

Regarding Craig Barrett's Dec. 23 op-ed, "A Talent Contest We're Losing":

Mr. Barrett suggested that the United States could lose the competition for
global talent because of the European Union's "Blue Card" plan to attract
workers from abroad.

But the Blue Card that Mr. Barrett said would mean that the "next Silicon
Valley will not be in the United States" does not even exist. It is just a
proposal by the E.U. bureaucracy. Because this proposal would require the
approval of all E.U. members, it is unlikely ever to become reality.

Mr. Barrett went on to assert that E.U. leaders recognize that foreign
graduates can "reinvigorate European industry." In reality, there is
widespread, high-level opposition to the proposal. At a December meeting to
discuss the idea, Germany's employment minister said there is no need for
it. Leaders from Britain, the Czech Republic, Austria and the Netherlands
have been among those to criticize it.

We can only hope that U.S. immigration policy will not be influenced by
hysteria from those seeing mere phantoms in Europe.


JOHN MIANO


Summit, N.J.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/21/AR2007122101
919.html

A Talent Contest We're Losing


By Craig Barrett
Sunday, December 23, 2007; B07

The European Union took a step recently that the U.S. Congress can't seem
to muster the courage to take. By proposing a simple change in immigration
policy, E.U. politicians served notice that they are serious about
competing with the United States and Asia to attract the world's top talent
to live, work and innovate in Europe. With Congress gridlocked on
immigration, it's clear that the next Silicon Valley will not be in the
United States.

European politicians face many of the same political pressures surrounding
immigration as their U.S. counterparts, and they, too, are not immune to
those pressures. Nationalist and anti-immigrant factions in several Western
European countries have made political gains in recent elections and are
widely viewed as mainstream. Despite the hot-button nature of immigration
issues, though, E.U. politicians advanced the "Blue Card" proposal in late
October.

The plan is designed to attract highly educated workers by creating a
temporary but renewable two-year visa. A streamlined application process
would allow qualified prospective workers to navigate the system and start
working in high-need jobs within one to three months.

This contrasts starkly with the byzantine system in place in the United
States, which increasingly threatens America's long-term competitiveness.

The United States relies primarily on two programs to augment its workforce
with highly educated, highly skilled foreign professionals. The H-1B visa
is a three-year temporary visa that can be renewed once. The
employment-based (EB) green card is the program for permanent residency.
Both programs serve the needs of U.S. employers seeking to fill job
vacancies in highly skilled professions. Extreme shortages of visas in both
these programs are well documented.

H-1B visas, which are capped at 85,000 per year, are now gone in one day,
with the "winners" determined by lottery.

The EB green card program has an annual allotment of 140,000 visas; these
are allocated equally across all countries around the world, regardless of
population. The inflexible country quotas mean that professionals from
countries such as China and India are almost always at a disadvantage,
finding themselves stuck in a system -- often for five to 10 years -- in
which they cannot seek promotions and raises. Spouses and children count
against the quota, which has not been raised since 1990. And even though
they count against the quota of foreign workers allowed to come here,
spouses are inexplicably forbidden to work, no matter their level of
education and skill.

The U.S. system forces thousands of valuable foreign-born professionals --
including badly needed researchers, scientists, teachers and engineers --
into legal and professional limbo for years. Not surprisingly, many are
considering opportunities in competitor nations -- even those who have
lived in the United States for years and have graduated from American
universities.

To be competitive in the global economy, U.S. companies depend on
specialized talent coming out of U.S. graduate schools. These scientists
and engineers are often foreign-born, as more than half of U.S. engineering
master's students and PhD recipients are international students. Yet
America shuts the door on many of these highly educated graduates, forcing
them to look abroad for opportunities -- and our competitors are
capitalizing on our failed policies.

E.U. leaders recognize that the top minds coming out of universities in the
United States and other countries can help to reinvigorate European
industry and enable it to create the next wave of businesses that drive
innovation and economic growth.

While its Blue Card proposal still requires approval by member countries,
Europe has sent a message. It intends to aggressively pursue the
professional talent necessary to compete on the global stage. The United
States, on the other hand, seems intent on driving away the very same
talent the European Union is rolling out the red carpet to welcome.

The writer is chairman of Intel Corp., which employs about 2,000 employees
with H-1B visas among its 86,000 workers worldwide.




- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm

Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm

To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
email with UNSUbSCRIBE in the subject window
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -