In a message dated 12/4/07 9:28:15 P.M. Central Standard Time, News@JobDestruction.info writes:
<<<<< JOB DESTRUCTION NEWSLETTER No. 1793 -- 12/04/2007 >>>>>
Paul Craig Roberts opens his superb editorial with mention of the
Cohen&Gribsby videos. I'm sure by now all of you have seen the videos, but
just in case here are the links.
http://lyrelyrepantzandfier.com/
Entire Immigration Seminar Video Clips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU
Programmer's Guild Video, 6/16/2007
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.counterpunch.org/roberts12042007.html
December 4, 2007
The Shortage Myth
The Lies at the End of the American Dream
By PAUL CRAIG ROBERTS
Last June a revealing marketing video from the law firm, Cohen & Grigsby
appeared on the Internet. The video demonstrated the law firm's techniques
for getting around US law governing work visas in order to enable corporate
clients to replace their American employees with foreigners who work for
less. The law firm's marketing manager, Lawrence Lebowitz, is upfront with
interested clients: "our goal is clearly not to find a qualified and
interested US worker."
If an American somehow survives the weeding out process, "have the manager
of that specific position step in and go through the whole process to find
a legal basis to disqualify them for this position--in most cases there
doesn't seem to be a problem."
No problem for the employer he means, only for the expensively educated
American university graduate who is displaced by a foreigner imported on a
work visa justified by a nonexistent shortage of trained and qualified
Americans.
University of California computer science professor Norm Matloff, who
watches this issue closely, said that Cohen & Grigsby's practices are the
standard ones used by hordes of attorneys, who are cleaning up by putting
Americans out of work.
The Cohen & Grigsby video was a short-term sensation as it undermined the
business propaganda that no American employee was being displaced by
foreigners on H-1b or L-1 work visas. Soon, however, business organizations
and their shills were back in gear lying to Congress and the public about
the amazing shortage of qualified Americans for literally every technical
and professional occupation, especially IT and software engineering.
Everywhere we hear the same droning lie from business interests that there
are not enough American engineers and scientists. For mysterious reasons
Americans prefer to be waitresses and bartenders, hospital orderlies, and
retail clerks.
As one of the few who writes about this short-sighted policy of American
managers endeavoring to maximize their "performance bonuses," I receive
much feedback from affected Americans. Many responses come from recent
university graduates such as the one who "graduated nearly at the top of my
class in 2002" with degrees in both electrical and computer engineering and
who "hasn't been able to find a job."
A college roommate of a family member graduated from a good engineering
school last year with a degree in software engineering. He had one job
interview. Jobless, he is back at home living with his parents and burdened
with student loans that bought an education that offshoring and work visas
have made useless to Americans.
The hundreds of individual cases that have been brought to my attention are
dismissed as "anecdotal" by my fellow economists. So little do they know. I
also receive numerous responses from American engineers and IT workers who
have managed to hold on to jobs or to find new ones after long intervals
when they have been displaced by foreign hires. Their descriptions of their
work environments are fascinating.
For example, Dayton, Ohio, was once home to numerous American engineers.
Today, writes one surviving American, "I feel like an alien in my own
country--as if Dayton had been colonized by India. NCR and other local
employers have either offshored most of their IT work or rely heavily on
Indian guest workers. The IT department of National City Bank across the
street from LexisNexis is entirely Indian. The nearby apartment complexes
house large numbers of Indian guest workers filling the engineering needs
of many area businesses."
I have learned that Reed Elsevier, which owns LexisNexis, has hired a new
Indian vice president for offshoring and that now the jobs of the Indian
guest workers may be on the verge of being offshored to another country.
The relentless drive for cheap labor now threatens the foreign guest
workers who displaced America's own engineers.
One software engineer wrote to me protesting the ignorance of Thomas
Friedman for creating a false picture of American engineers being outdated
and for "denouncing American engineers and other workers as 'xenophobes'
for opposing their displacement by foreign guest workers." The engineer
also took exception to the "willful ignorance or cynicism of Bruce Bartlett
and George Will" who he described as "bootlicks for pro-outsourcing
lobbies."
On November 6, 2006, Michael S. Teitelbaum, vice president of the Alfred P.
Sloan Foundation, explained to a subcommittee of the House Committee on
Science and Technology the difference between the conventional or false
portrait that there is a shortage of US scientists and engineers and the
reality on the ground, which is that offshoring, foreign guest workers, and
educational subsidies have produced a surplus of US engineers and
scientists that leaves many facing unstable and failed careers.
As two examples of the false portrait, Teitelbaum cited the 2005 report,
Tapping America's Potential, led by the Business Roundtable and signed onto
by 14 other business associations, and the 2006 National Academies report,
Rising Above the Gathering Storm, "which was the basis for substantial
parts of what eventually evolved into the American COMPETES Act."
Teitelbaum posed the question to the US Representatives: "Why do you
continue to hear energetic re-assertions of the Conventional Portrait of
'shortages,' shortfalls, failures of K-12 science and math teaching,
declining interest among US students, and the necessity of importing more
foreign scientists and engineers?"
Teitelbaum's answer: "In my judgment, what you are hearing is simply the
expressions of interests by interest groups and their lobbyists. This
phenomenon is, of course, very familiar to everyone on the Hill. Interest
groups that are well organized and funded have the capacity to make their
claims heard by you, either directly or via echoes in the mass press.
Meanwhile those who are not well-organized and funded can express their
views, but only as individuals."
Among the interest groups that benefit from the false portrait are
universities, which gain graduate student enrollments and inexpensive
postdocs to conduct funded lab research. Employers gain larger profits from
lower paid scientists and engineers, and immigration lawyers gain fees by
leading employers around the work visa rules.
Using the biomedical research sector as an example, Teitelbaum explained to
the congressmen how research funding creates an oversupply of scientists
that requires ever larger funding to keep employed. Teitelbaum made it
clear that it is nonsensical to simultaneously increase the supply of
American scientists while forestalling their employment with a shortage
myth that is used to import foreigners on work visas.
Teitelbaum recommends that American students considering majors in science
and engineering first investigate the career prospects of recent graduates.
Integrity is so lacking in America that the shortage myth serves the
interests of universities, funding agencies, employers, and immigration
attorneys at the expense of American students who naively pursue
professions in which their prospects are dim. Initially it was blue-collar
factory workers who were abandoned by US corporations and politicians. Now
it is white-collar employees and Americans trained in science and
technology. Princeton University economist Alan Blinder estimates that
there are 30 to 40 million American high end service jobs that ultimately
face offshoring.
As I predict, and as BLS payroll jobs data indicate, in 20 years the US
will have a third world work force engaged in domestic nontradable
services.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan
administration. He was Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal
editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review. He is coauthor
of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.He can be reached at:
PaulCraigRoberts@yahoo.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Newsletter Homepage:
http://www.JobDestruction.com/shameh1b/JobDestructionNews.htm
Support this Newsletter and www.JobDestruction.com by donating:
www.zazona.com/Donations.htm
To Be removed from this mailing list, reply to this
email with UNSUbSCRIBE in the subject window
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -